Energy Partnerships and Technology Transfer in Uzbekistan: Comparison of Russian and Chinese Engagement
Abstract
Uzbekistan's energy transition involves cooperation with several external partners, including Russia in gas and nuclear energy and China in renewable-energy projects, equipment and related training. This article examines how such partnerships can contribute to energy-system development and domestic technical capability, while identifying which longer-term service and technology arrangements require closer assessment. A structured documentary comparison distinguishes publicly reported projects and educational initiatives from contractual terms and capability outcomes not disclosed in the available sources. The evidence documents different but potentially complementary roles for Russian and Chinese partners. It does not establish that Uzbekistan is subject to dual-source technological lock-in or that either partner's projects are operationally incompatible. Building on a three-layer framework and recent research on energy resilience and technology learning, the article outlines a qualitative appraisal approach covering maintenance options, critical components, data governance and demonstrable local skills. The proposed approach would allow future project assessments to test potential dependencies alongside investment, reliability and technology-transfer benefits. The contribution is a transparent framework for evidence-based policy appraisal, not an empirical ranking of external partners.
Keywords
- Uzbekistan
- energy cooperation
- energy security
- Russia
- China
- technology transfer
- human capital
- life-cycle appraisal
References
- Seto, K. C., Davis, S. J., Mitchell, R. B., Stokes, E. C., Unruh, G. C., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2016). Carbon lock-in: Types, causes, and policy implications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41, 425–452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934
- Shadrina, E. (2025). EU's and Japan's strategies for energy transition enhancement in Central Asia: Exploring comparative and synergic perspectives. Energy Strategy Reviews, 58, 101658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2025.101658
- Sirin, S. M., Abuouf, S., & Elshurafa, A. M. (2025). Is the single-buyer model a barrier to clean energy deployment? Empirical evidence on decarbonization and renewable energy supply in emerging and developing countries. Energy Policy, 206, 114753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114753
- Sulaimanova, B., Overland, I., Sabyrbekov, R., & Vakulchuk, R. (2023). Energy transition in Central Asia: A systematic literature review. In R. Sabyrbekov, I. Overland, & R. Vakulchuk (Eds.), Climate change in Central Asia: Decarbonization, energy transition and climate policy (pp. 69–82). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29831-8_6
- United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (2025a, July). Policy brief 1: Current landscape and future pathways for a just energy transition in Uzbekistan. https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2025-12/UZB%20JET%20Policy%20Brief%201.pdf
- United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (2025b, March). Modelling a resilient and integrated energy system for Central Asia: A roadmap for regional interconnectivity. https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2026-02/Modelling%20a%20Resilient%20and%20Integrated%20Energy%20System%20for%20Central%20Asia.pdf
- Unruh, G. C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28(12), 817–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7
- Zabanova, Y. (2023). Towards a geoeconomics of energy transition in Central Asia's hydrocarbon-producing countries. In R. Sabyrbekov, I. Overland, & R. Vakulchuk (Eds.), Climate change in Central Asia: Decarbonization, energy transition and climate policy (pp. 95–107). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29831-8_8
- Zhakiyev, N., Khamzina, A., Toimbek, D., Omirgaliyev, R., Kotamjani, S. S., Nazari, M. A., & Salem, M. (2025). Energy systems, CO2 emissions, and mitigation policies in three Central Asian countries: A comprehensive review. Energy Strategy Reviews, 62, 101883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2025.101883